I’m curious why this was designed to be non-anonymous? It feels more in the spirit of “be aware I could destroy something, and choosing not to” if it doesn’t have cost to me, beyond awareness that destruction is sad
I think I will write a follow-up post in a day or so, after the site is back up. For now, I’ll leave y’all to figure out wtf to believe about the world in light of this.
In the meantime I’m happy to confirm any basic facts. Indeed, user Chris_Leong submitted his unique launch codes at 4:33am Pacific Time, bringing down the LessWrong Frontpage for 24 hours.
I’m curious why this was designed to be non-anonymous? It feels more in the spirit of “be aware I could destroy something, and choosing not to” if it doesn’t have cost to me, beyond awareness that destruction is sad
(As I stayed up quite late setting this all up, I will answer questions tomorrow… or at least, I will if the site is still up!)
I think I will write a follow-up post in a day or so, after the site is back up. For now, I’ll leave y’all to figure out wtf to believe about the world in light of this.
In the meantime I’m happy to confirm any basic facts. Indeed, user Chris_Leong submitted his unique launch codes at 4:33am Pacific Time, bringing down the LessWrong Frontpage for 24 hours.