When humans try to process undefined statements we don’t crash. Instead we conceive something that seems like it could be meaningful, even if it’s inconceivable.
Physics is consistent. Humans are physics. “What a human would predict from this inconsistent set of statements” is often consistent and unambiguous as most communication. I think this is a necessary tool for thinking about law.
Physics is consistent. Humans are physics. “What a human would predict from this inconsistent set of statements” is often consistent and unambiguous as most communication. I think this is a necessary tool for thinking about law.