That last point sub-point is a little vague, so let my clarify my personal cut-off on this. Others may disagree.
I wouldn’t object to seeing the occasional brief overt statement coming directly from Geoff that his recollection doesn’t match someone else’s interpretation.
I would object to any further encouragement of things that resemble the “strong, repeated pressure by someone close to Geoff to have the post marked as flawed” that Ruby described.
Consistently denouncing the later going forward, would be very helpful.
I want to clarify that using the word “threat” in my case would cause one to overestimate the severity by 5-20x or something of the pressure I experienced (more so than “strong pressure”). Not that the word is strictly wrong, but the connotations of it are too strong. I might end up listing the actual behaviors in a bit, maybe after more dialog with the person in question.
That last point sub-point is a little vague, so let my clarify my personal cut-off on this. Others may disagree.
I wouldn’t object to seeing the occasional brief overt statement coming directly from Geoff that his recollection doesn’t match someone else’s interpretation.
I would object to any further encouragement of things that resemble the “strong, repeated pressure by someone close to Geoff to have the post marked as flawed” that Ruby described.
Consistently denouncing the later going forward, would be very helpful.
I want to clarify that using the word “threat” in my case would cause one to overestimate the severity by 5-20x or something of the pressure I experienced (more so than “strong pressure”). Not that the word is strictly wrong, but the connotations of it are too strong. I might end up listing the actual behaviors in a bit, maybe after more dialog with the person in question.
When I said “last sub-point?”
I was referring to “make any strong stealthy attempts to socially discredit people,” not “threaten” (by which I mean, “threaten”).
I was deliberately treating “no threats” as minimum, and “no strong social pressure” as extra-credit.
Ah, gotcha. I misunderstood the meaning of “sub-point”.