I give this a +9, one of the most useful posts of the year.
I think that a lot of these are pretty non-obvious guidelines that make sense when explained, and I continue to put effort in to practicing them. Separating observations and inferences is pro-social, making falsifiable claims is pro-social, etc.
I like this document both for carefully condensing the core ideas into 10 short guidelines, and also having longer explanations for those who want to engage with them.
I like that it’s phrased as guidelines rather than rules/norms. I do break these from time to time and endorse it.
I don’t agree with everything, this is not an endorsement, I have many nuances and different phrasings and different standards, but I think this is a worthwhile document for people to study, especially those approaching this sort of discourse for the first time, and it’s v well-written.
I give this a +9, one of the most useful posts of the year.
I think that a lot of these are pretty non-obvious guidelines that make sense when explained, and I continue to put effort in to practicing them. Separating observations and inferences is pro-social, making falsifiable claims is pro-social, etc.
I like this document both for carefully condensing the core ideas into 10 short guidelines, and also having longer explanations for those who want to engage with them.
I like that it’s phrased as guidelines rather than rules/norms. I do break these from time to time and endorse it.
I don’t agree with everything, this is not an endorsement, I have many nuances and different phrasings and different standards, but I think this is a worthwhile document for people to study, especially those approaching this sort of discourse for the first time, and it’s v well-written.