Possibly it somehow got lucky with its pattern-matching heuristics. The start of B is 64, 6, 9, 91, 59, 47… And 59 is similar to 39, which occurs a few numbers later in the list. So it’s a successful subset which is not too many permutations and substitutions away from the original list.
This makes sense. Another thought I had was that I picked 50 numbers 1-100. It could’ve just gotten lucky. If I were to do this again, I’d do 1-1000 to decrease the odds of this.
I am confused how it got the answer correct without running code?
Possibly it somehow got lucky with its pattern-matching heuristics. The start of B is 64, 6, 9, 91, 59, 47… And 59 is similar to 39, which occurs a few numbers later in the list. So it’s a successful subset which is not too many permutations and substitutions away from the original list.
This makes sense. Another thought I had was that I picked 50 numbers 1-100. It could’ve just gotten lucky. If I were to do this again, I’d do 1-1000 to decrease the odds of this.