I am reminded of the first time Australian musician Lester Vat did his famous show Why Am I A Pie? (there’s audio and video there.) He got up on stage at a rock’n’roll pub—it was a “What Is Music?” weird noise festival, but no-one expected this—went up to the microphone, and for forty-five minutes, just repeated the words:
“Why … am I … a pie?” “Why … am I … a pie?” ”Why … am I … a pie?”
After fifteen minutes people didn’t even have the energy left to tell him to fuck off. By twenty minutes people were slamdancing to it.
The Horrible Humming was great in itself, but it felt a bit artificial to me : why didn’t the Auror just cast a Quietus charm ? Silencing prisoners with a gag is not that unusual in the Muggle world, and I would definitely except the wizards to use a Quietus charm or equivalent if a prisoner started to bother the Aurors with sound. It’s not like Wizard Britain is very respectful of human rights of prisoners and that gags (mundane or magical ones) would be felt a non-acceptable behavior.
I also really doubt that any police force would let a prisoner resist them that way again and again, they would call reinforcement and break him. Even if he didn’t do anything before, just resisting police forces is a criminal in many places, and it would really surprise me if Wizard Britain, with its awful human rights record, would let that go.
Edit : unless there is something much, much deeper at work here. Like Quirrel imperiusing or controlling in another way some high-ranking officers.
Wizarding police have to allow for the fact that some possible prisoners (Dumbledore, Grindelwald, Voldemort) are capable of beating up the whole police department put together. When someone displays surprising power, it makes sense to back off, at least until you’re sure you can take him.
Hum, in canon at least, when they try to arrest Dumbledore at the end of tome 5 (HP and the Order of the Phoenix) they don’t seem that hesitant to arrest him, as soon as they have proof he’s doing something illegal, and they seem quite surprised he escaped.
But that could be a point of divergence between canon and HP:MoR, especially if the head of the Auror is very intelligent in HP:MoR, she could know about not escalating conflicts too easily.
Yeah, MoR has a much more well-thought-through concept of what it means to be a powerful wizard, and the difference between that and a normal wizard.
And even in canon, I’m not sure it makes sense for them to be surprised he could escape- everyone thinks of Dumbledore as the most powerful wizard alive- but they could have conceivably been expecting him not to attempt to resist arrest, because he’s generally more law-abiding than that.
I also really doubt that any police force would let a prisoner resist them that way again and again, they would call reinforcement and break him.
It happens they did not. We know that, because he isn’t broken and there’s no sign they tried, other than the mention that he has apparently sneezed more than once. Also, he’s not under arrest.
The Defense Professor of Hogwarts was being detained, not arrested, not even intimidated.
Magical Britain has a history of exceedingly powerful individuals that the muggle world just doesn’t. It is not unreasonable that law enforcement developed differently as a result.
To cast the charm would be effectively to admit defeat before an unarmed prisoner (in a way that calling in a replacement according to standard procedure wouldn’t), and also to be roundly mocked by other Aurors if they found out. Or so the Auror in question presumably thought.
EY is one hilarious fellow. He should do standup. The Horrible Humming was just too funny.
And interesting too, because you wonder if it could work.
Tolerance for rejection is a much harder qualifier to meet for success in standup than being funny is. Just, you know, so you know.
I am reminded of the first time Australian musician Lester Vat did his famous show Why Am I A Pie? (there’s audio and video there.) He got up on stage at a rock’n’roll pub—it was a “What Is Music?” weird noise festival, but no-one expected this—went up to the microphone, and for forty-five minutes, just repeated the words:
“Why … am I … a pie?”
“Why … am I … a pie?”
”Why … am I … a pie?”
After fifteen minutes people didn’t even have the energy left to tell him to fuck off. By twenty minutes people were slamdancing to it.
Repetition. It’s powerful stuff.
Relevant.
After three minutes, I’d be out of the bar and telling the manager not to expect me back.
Correction: After I saw the sign, I’d realize that people have far too much time on their hands, and go home without setting foot in the bar.
That said, even the sort of people who go to such events probably have some limits.
Yes. It sounds like it takes them twenty minutes to start making the best of things.
The Horrible Humming was great in itself, but it felt a bit artificial to me : why didn’t the Auror just cast a Quietus charm ? Silencing prisoners with a gag is not that unusual in the Muggle world, and I would definitely except the wizards to use a Quietus charm or equivalent if a prisoner started to bother the Aurors with sound. It’s not like Wizard Britain is very respectful of human rights of prisoners and that gags (mundane or magical ones) would be felt a non-acceptable behavior.
Quirrell would probably have sneezed it away, again.
I also really doubt that any police force would let a prisoner resist them that way again and again, they would call reinforcement and break him. Even if he didn’t do anything before, just resisting police forces is a criminal in many places, and it would really surprise me if Wizard Britain, with its awful human rights record, would let that go.
Edit : unless there is something much, much deeper at work here. Like Quirrel imperiusing or controlling in another way some high-ranking officers.
Wizarding police have to allow for the fact that some possible prisoners (Dumbledore, Grindelwald, Voldemort) are capable of beating up the whole police department put together. When someone displays surprising power, it makes sense to back off, at least until you’re sure you can take him.
Hum, in canon at least, when they try to arrest Dumbledore at the end of tome 5 (HP and the Order of the Phoenix) they don’t seem that hesitant to arrest him, as soon as they have proof he’s doing something illegal, and they seem quite surprised he escaped.
But that could be a point of divergence between canon and HP:MoR, especially if the head of the Auror is very intelligent in HP:MoR, she could know about not escalating conflicts too easily.
Yeah, MoR has a much more well-thought-through concept of what it means to be a powerful wizard, and the difference between that and a normal wizard.
And even in canon, I’m not sure it makes sense for them to be surprised he could escape- everyone thinks of Dumbledore as the most powerful wizard alive- but they could have conceivably been expecting him not to attempt to resist arrest, because he’s generally more law-abiding than that.
It happens they did not. We know that, because he isn’t broken and there’s no sign they tried, other than the mention that he has apparently sneezed more than once. Also, he’s not under arrest.
Magical Britain has a history of exceedingly powerful individuals that the muggle world just doesn’t. It is not unreasonable that law enforcement developed differently as a result.
Listening and watching—monitoring—appears to be part of the job.
Because of the humor, I’m willing to suspend belief a little on realism. It’s not a fundamental plot point. But it is funny.
To cast the charm would be effectively to admit defeat before an unarmed prisoner (in a way that calling in a replacement according to standard procedure wouldn’t), and also to be roundly mocked by other Aurors if they found out. Or so the Auror in question presumably thought.
Casting the charm is also an admission of defeat.