A clarifying question—is this more of a “here are the changes that we’re going to make unless people find serious problems with them” kind of document (implying that ~everything in it will be implemented), or more of a “here are changes that we think seem the most promising, later on we’ll decide which ones we’ll actually implement” type of document (implying that only some limited subset will be implemented)?
Great work!
A clarifying question—is this more of a “here are the changes that we’re going to make unless people find serious problems with them” kind of document (implying that ~everything in it will be implemented), or more of a “here are changes that we think seem the most promising, later on we’ll decide which ones we’ll actually implement” type of document (implying that only some limited subset will be implemented)?
I would like to see as many of these implementations made in the least break-things order possible.
I already culled a lot of the unpromising ones, (yes some of these are less promising, i.e. maybe having subs will create a ghost town)