I’m responding the statement about question about evolutionary history and is=/=ought
I’m trivialising the question and suggesting that ‘ought’ should be reduced to ‘is’. I hypothesize this has therapeutic effects, since it approximates acceptance and commitment, and established therapeutic process.
For example, we have an explanation of how love works, and you want to love in other kinds of ways, but I, for one, get satisfaction from satisficing my apriori biological goals.
See where I’m coming from?
edit 1: here’s a wiki article to help the ethical naturalist explaination
I’m responding the statement about question about evolutionary history and is=/=ought
I’m trivialising the question and suggesting that ‘ought’ should be reduced to ‘is’. I hypothesize this has therapeutic effects, since it approximates acceptance and commitment, and established therapeutic process.
For example, we have an explanation of how love works, and you want to love in other kinds of ways, but I, for one, get satisfaction from satisficing my apriori biological goals.
See where I’m coming from?
edit 1: here’s a wiki article to help the ethical naturalist explaination