Same questions to you, but with “rocks” for “frogs”.
Eliezer didn’t say he was 100% sure frogs weren’t objects of moral worth, nor is it a priori unreasonable to believe there exists a sharp cutoff without knowing where it is.
Same questions to you, but with “rocks” for “frogs”.
Eliezer didn’t say he was 100% sure frogs weren’t objects of moral worth, nor is it a priori unreasonable to believe there exists a sharp cutoff without knowing where it is.