At least 6 navy staff on those boats have very publicly and extensively testified to having seen a very strange propulsion technology.
Even if it were true, how would they know it was a propulsion technology?
Regardless, if you are sure that it’s definitely not aliens, you should be extremely interested in the possibility that humans, hence, appear to have created practical alcubierre drives.
I’m very sure it’s not this either. Alcubierre drives have several issues, such as requiring negative energy densities, not having any way of accelerating them, or requiring astronomical amounts of energy.
Even if it were true, how would they know it was a propulsion technology?
Uh, because there seemed to be a solid object (showed up in a kind of radar that we don’t know how to spoof) that was moving around really fast in line with the visual. As stated, I still think it might not be a propulsion technology, but the witnesses don’t tend to float any other possibility. I haven’t seen them asked about the plasma image theory.
I wouldn’t say I think that it’s an alcubierre drive specifically, what I mean is I don’t know what else to liken it to and it would seem to share a lot of qualities.
I agree that the videos are not really very interesting at all. The recordings (radars) of the most interesting parts of the encounter were not released. A pilot, Fravor, says they were confiscated (this would be consistent with the US plasma image tech). (I think former AATIP (the previous UFO reporting program) lead, Luis Elizondo, sort touches on the way they only released the crappy videos, though I don’t think he really explained it at all, in this conversation with skeptic Mick West.)
Even if it were true, how would they know it was a propulsion technology?
I’m very sure it’s not this either. Alcubierre drives have several issues, such as requiring negative energy densities, not having any way of accelerating them, or requiring astronomical amounts of energy.
This video debunks some of the Pentagon’s UFO footage, and I have no reason to doubt that the other videos have similarly mundane explanations.
Uh, because there seemed to be a solid object (showed up in a kind of radar that we don’t know how to spoof) that was moving around really fast in line with the visual. As stated, I still think it might not be a propulsion technology, but the witnesses don’t tend to float any other possibility. I haven’t seen them asked about the plasma image theory.
I wouldn’t say I think that it’s an alcubierre drive specifically, what I mean is I don’t know what else to liken it to and it would seem to share a lot of qualities.
I agree that the videos are not really very interesting at all. The recordings (radars) of the most interesting parts of the encounter were not released. A pilot, Fravor, says they were confiscated (this would be consistent with the US plasma image tech). (I think former AATIP (the previous UFO reporting program) lead, Luis Elizondo, sort touches on the way they only released the crappy videos, though I don’t think he really explained it at all, in this conversation with skeptic Mick West.)