So… were you presented with a convincing argument that this statement is unprovable, you would consider Catholicism (or a version suitably sanitized from “anti-epistemology”) seriously?
I already don’t think that statement is provable—it’s informal, something more specific would be “the supernatural divine interventions described in religious traditions did not happen”, and even that may be described as “unprovable”; proof is for maths.
So… were you presented with a convincing argument that this statement is unprovable, you would consider Catholicism (or a version suitably sanitized from “anti-epistemology”) seriously?
I already don’t think that statement is provable—it’s informal, something more specific would be “the supernatural divine interventions described in religious traditions did not happen”, and even that may be described as “unprovable”; proof is for maths.