Based on what you are saying, I end up thinking of 3 buckets:
Socialization-as-perceived-wisdom
(I learned about the word dialectic the other day, and it would probably fit here somehow)
Maximizing results in society
Maximizing results general
Some of your items could fall into the first category, but I don’t think all of them would. Is your reduced trust in any specific system due to a value (item 3), or based on results of your actions?
I think the key might be to develop methods of measuring your sanity.
I have often questioned my judgement when in disagreements. But it is hard to tell if judgement is good or not, especially if all I have to measure it is my opinion.
But if we measure the value of judgement or wisdom based on the results of their actions, then it is not as value-driven. Of course measuring results is still subjective, so it needs to be compared to what the intended outcome of the action was as well. Additionally, we would need to obtain a large enough sample size, otherwise we could conclude that lottery winners have better judgement than lottery losers.
Actually now that I think about it more, the second half of your article sounds like you are more concerned with your beliefs more than your heuristics. I am not sure if I would consider beliefs a component of wisdom, but I am not opposed to the idea either. I could believe in a flying spaghetti monster and still have wisdom. Though that example is not a proven fact, just something I believe.
Edit: Also thinking about it more, there is the decision between tools of perception, option generation, decision making, and implementation. Maybe the problem is that wisdom consists of so many sub-topics.
Definitely an interesting article.
Based on what you are saying, I end up thinking of 3 buckets:
Socialization-as-perceived-wisdom
(I learned about the word dialectic the other day, and it would probably fit here somehow)
Maximizing results in society
Maximizing results general
Some of your items could fall into the first category, but I don’t think all of them would. Is your reduced trust in any specific system due to a value (item 3), or based on results of your actions?
I think the key might be to develop methods of measuring your sanity.
I have often questioned my judgement when in disagreements. But it is hard to tell if judgement is good or not, especially if all I have to measure it is my opinion.
But if we measure the value of judgement or wisdom based on the results of their actions, then it is not as value-driven. Of course measuring results is still subjective, so it needs to be compared to what the intended outcome of the action was as well. Additionally, we would need to obtain a large enough sample size, otherwise we could conclude that lottery winners have better judgement than lottery losers.
Actually now that I think about it more, the second half of your article sounds like you are more concerned with your beliefs more than your heuristics. I am not sure if I would consider beliefs a component of wisdom, but I am not opposed to the idea either. I could believe in a flying spaghetti monster and still have wisdom. Though that example is not a proven fact, just something I believe.
Edit: Also thinking about it more, there is the decision between tools of perception, option generation, decision making, and implementation. Maybe the problem is that wisdom consists of so many sub-topics.