Seems like a difference between wanting and liking. What you want is not the same as what will make you happy when you get it, because humans are not utility maximizers. For example, you may not like being an addict, but you still want the drug. Not making a difference between wanting and liking makes talking about humans confused.
Similarly (warning: getting into the politically dangerous territory again), there is a difference between what (stereotypical, heterosexual, etc.) women like, and what they want. Politically correct people deny the “wanting”. PUAs deny the reality of “liking”. Fact is, humans are messed up in many aspects, female sexual attraction being just one of many examples.
Women don’t like being abused, just like alcoholics don’t like the hangovers. Yet some women cannot resist the abusive guys, just like some alcoholics cannot resist taking a drink. Both things can be true at the same time. (It would be crazy to deny that alcoholics wants to drink, but it would be also crazy to say that alcoholics actually enjoy the hangovers and only pretend to hate them because they are socially expected to.)
A sane adult human should recognize the difference between their liking and wanting, and act accordingly. Media usually do not act as promoters of sanity. They do not have an incentive to be even consistent. On Monday, media will tell you horror stories about alcoholics. On Tuesday, media will tell you that alcohol is fun. Media don’t care about fucking up your life if you listen to their stories. They care about profit; and sometimes the profitable thing is something that will fuck up your life as a side effect.
But it is not fair to blame the bartender, if you put him into “damnned if you do, damned if you don’t” situation. You are already drunk, and you want yet another drink. If he gives you as much alcohol as you can drink, you will end up in hospital, and your family will write angry blogs about the bartender. But if he refuses to give you another drink, then you will go to another bar and you will write an angry blog about him. Okay, we could agree that the bartender who gives people more drinks than they can handle is a bad guy, and he should lose his license and go to jail. But putting one bartender in jail will not fix your alcoholism. If you blame half of the bartenders for giving you another drink, and another half for not giving you another drink… maybe you should stop focusing on what the bartenders are doing wrong, and start reflecting on yourself; maybe with some professional help. No, media advice is not professional help, and people liking and sharing your blogs on facebook is not a proof of your sanity.
(In a way, even the media is just a meta-bartender. If they stop publishing stories that fuck up your life, you will probably become bored and switch to their competition.)
Seems like a difference between wanting and liking. What you want is not the same as what will make you happy when you get it, because humans are not utility maximizers. For example, you may not like being an addict, but you still want the drug. Not making a difference between wanting and liking makes talking about humans confused.
Similarly (warning: getting into the politically dangerous territory again), there is a difference between what (stereotypical, heterosexual, etc.) women like, and what they want. Politically correct people deny the “wanting”. PUAs deny the reality of “liking”. Fact is, humans are messed up in many aspects, female sexual attraction being just one of many examples.
Women don’t like being abused, just like alcoholics don’t like the hangovers. Yet some women cannot resist the abusive guys, just like some alcoholics cannot resist taking a drink. Both things can be true at the same time. (It would be crazy to deny that alcoholics wants to drink, but it would be also crazy to say that alcoholics actually enjoy the hangovers and only pretend to hate them because they are socially expected to.)
A sane adult human should recognize the difference between their liking and wanting, and act accordingly. Media usually do not act as promoters of sanity. They do not have an incentive to be even consistent. On Monday, media will tell you horror stories about alcoholics. On Tuesday, media will tell you that alcohol is fun. Media don’t care about fucking up your life if you listen to their stories. They care about profit; and sometimes the profitable thing is something that will fuck up your life as a side effect.
But it is not fair to blame the bartender, if you put him into “damnned if you do, damned if you don’t” situation. You are already drunk, and you want yet another drink. If he gives you as much alcohol as you can drink, you will end up in hospital, and your family will write angry blogs about the bartender. But if he refuses to give you another drink, then you will go to another bar and you will write an angry blog about him. Okay, we could agree that the bartender who gives people more drinks than they can handle is a bad guy, and he should lose his license and go to jail. But putting one bartender in jail will not fix your alcoholism. If you blame half of the bartenders for giving you another drink, and another half for not giving you another drink… maybe you should stop focusing on what the bartenders are doing wrong, and start reflecting on yourself; maybe with some professional help. No, media advice is not professional help, and people liking and sharing your blogs on facebook is not a proof of your sanity.
(In a way, even the media is just a meta-bartender. If they stop publishing stories that fuck up your life, you will probably become bored and switch to their competition.)