Natural risk, these folks say 100% prob that universe is cyclic, and a collapse will come.
“They first used Jacobson’s formalism of Einstein’s general theory of relativity, where the Einstein equation is basically described as thermodynamical equation. They then studied the corrections to the Einstein equations from quantum effects.”
″ In fact, we are able to analyze the pre Big Bang state of the Universe. Furthermore, the equations imply that the expansion of the Universe will come to a halt and then will immediately be followed by a contracting phase. When the equations are extrapolated beyond the maximum rate of contraction, a cyclic Universe scenario emerges.”
Natural risk, these folks say 100% prob that universe is cyclic, and a collapse will come.
“They first used Jacobson’s formalism of Einstein’s general theory of relativity, where the Einstein equation is basically described as thermodynamical equation. They then studied the corrections to the Einstein equations from quantum effects.”
″ In fact, we are able to analyze the pre Big Bang state of the Universe. Furthermore, the equations imply that the expansion of the Universe will come to a halt and then will immediately be followed by a contracting phase. When the equations are extrapolated beyond the maximum rate of contraction, a cyclic Universe scenario emerges.”
https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.00560
Does this hypothesis rule out the simulation argument?
and another for the natural xrisks map odds
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith%27s_Cloud
http://www.nature.com/news/meteorites-pummel-the-moon-far-more-than-expected-1.20777