Caching in will involve transfer rather than destruction of the stock. The stock will have a new owner who has then voluntarily bound to the production. At the very limit the single original owner could buy it back. If he is unwilling because he would run out of neccesity money ie bread then that would transfer the “frozeness” to the new owners.
That the value of the stocks goes down doesnt really impact the operation of the company. Money isn’t the same as production the impact would be mostly on the paper side of things instead of real economy.
Caching in will involve transfer rather than destruction of the stock. The stock will have a new owner who has then voluntarily bound to the production. At the very limit the single original owner could buy it back. If he is unwilling because he would run out of neccesity money ie bread then that would transfer the “frozeness” to the new owners.
The stock’s value declines (as supply has gone up). So the “frozen” money declines, too.
That the value of the stocks goes down doesnt really impact the operation of the company. Money isn’t the same as production the impact would be mostly on the paper side of things instead of real economy.