Which he himself knows, we’ve talked about German laws in the comments which has nothing to do with my agenda.
The main discussion thread was about your ideas. The fact that the discussion also lead to talking about laws because you made false claims about the community surrounding clicking misses the point.
You didn’t show interest in discussions with have nothing to do with your pet agenda.
Instead of doing ad hominems to keep people away or rally your support for a ban, why not read the updated website, as if it was a meditation exercise, and tell me what you think of it. If it could possible have any substance?
Because there’s no reason to read long articles simply because someone who’s judgement I don’t trust recommends them to me.
Because there’s no reason to read long articles simply because someone who’s judgement I don’t trust recommends them to me.
How were you capable of critiquing my ideas then? You don’t have to trust my judgment, trust Bachir’s unless his track-record isn’t telling enough. Well, actually, you should think for yourself.
Given that we disabled downvoting that isn’t a high bar.
I’ve posted here
Yes, but those posts were written after my above post. They are also quite short but I grant that they are a sign that you are interested in participating more in other discussions.
The main discussion thread was about your ideas. The fact that the discussion also lead to talking about laws because you made false claims about the community surrounding clicking misses the point.
You didn’t show interest in discussions with have nothing to do with your pet agenda.
Because there’s no reason to read long articles simply because someone who’s judgement I don’t trust recommends them to me.
Well I think I was quite unsure about that specific thing. I’ve posted here: http://lesswrong.com/lw/og0/ea_has_a_lying_problem/dkle and here http://lesswrong.com/lw/og1/pplapi_is_a_virtual_database_of_the_entire_human/dkmb and received positive points for both. So I do have interests outside my pet agenda. Even if it was today or yesterday.
How were you capable of critiquing my ideas then? You don’t have to trust my judgment, trust Bachir’s unless his track-record isn’t telling enough. Well, actually, you should think for yourself.
Given that we disabled downvoting that isn’t a high bar.
Yes, but those posts were written after my above post. They are also quite short but I grant that they are a sign that you are interested in participating more in other discussions.
Ok, thanks for your feedback.