Whaaa? I checked that. But you’re right. The last digit should simply not be there. I don’t know how that happened; presumably a bug in my convert-number-to-English-digit-names one-liner. Sorry.
Yeah. A bug in conversion to English digits, I think. (Unfortunately it was throwaway code in a now-closed window so I can’t check exactly what stupid thing I did.)
Funnily enough, I didn’t even write any code. Just figured out that I need a 100-digit numerator of a continued fraction convergent of pi, then found it on OEIS.
Ha! I can never remember which sorts of best approximation are guaranteed to be actual c.f. convergents and which might be “intermediate” ones that come from iterating the mediant construction. So I used PARI’s “bestappr” function. My bug was in code that had nothing to do with the actual mathematics.
OK, I think what I meant was: frira fvk svir bar svir mreb gjb frira guerr sbhe rvtug frira frira bar sbhe svir sbhe sbhe gjb svir frira fvk bar gjb avar rvtug rvtug gjb gjb rvtug mreb bar sbhe svir avar avar frira guerr avar avar svir guerr guerr avar fvk sbhe avar avar bar fvk bar rvtug gjb rvtug frira bar bar svir sbhe mreb svir svir sbhe guerr guerr gjb gjb bar fvk mreb rvtug gjb sbhe frira svir guerr rvtug guerr sbhe svir fvk sbhe avar gjb bar avar guerr mreb mreb guerr rvtug rvtug svir svir svir fvk mreb sbhe frira rvtug avar.
Nope. Your number is too big. Bigger than 10^100.
Whaaa? I checked that. But you’re right. The last digit should simply not be there. I don’t know how that happened; presumably a bug in my convert-number-to-English-digit-names one-liner. Sorry.
… which agrees with cousin_it’s answer; I promise I didn’t cheat :-).
I think you have one extra digit at the end.
Yeah. A bug in conversion to English digits, I think. (Unfortunately it was throwaway code in a now-closed window so I can’t check exactly what stupid thing I did.)
Funnily enough, I didn’t even write any code. Just figured out that I need a 100-digit numerator of a continued fraction convergent of pi, then found it on OEIS.
Ha! I can never remember which sorts of best approximation are guaranteed to be actual c.f. convergents and which might be “intermediate” ones that come from iterating the mediant construction. So I used PARI’s “bestappr” function. My bug was in code that had nothing to do with the actual mathematics.
Congratulations to you, too!