Me vs you, character assessment, lifelong risks financial & personal, equity & survival rate vs adversarial conflict ie violence and other difficult situations you have encountered. With decent verification.
Any trustworthy third party agreed by the both of us, information kept secret between us three. Assign your priors and get going.
I know nothing about you and the argument is all about me. How about this—a bet on whether I can demonstrate being significantly above the average (population or LW, doesn’t matter) by the criteria you listed a couple of posts up plus “lifelong risks financial & personal, equity & survival rate vs adversarial conflict ie violence and other difficult situations you have encountered”. Some things might be difficult to verify but we can let the arbiter decide whether s/he trust them or not.
So who bets what and how will the bet be decided?
Me vs you, character assessment, lifelong risks financial & personal, equity & survival rate vs adversarial conflict ie violence and other difficult situations you have encountered. With decent verification.
Any trustworthy third party agreed by the both of us, information kept secret between us three. Assign your priors and get going.
I know nothing about you and the argument is all about me. How about this—a bet on whether I can demonstrate being significantly above the average (population or LW, doesn’t matter) by the criteria you listed a couple of posts up plus “lifelong risks financial & personal, equity & survival rate vs adversarial conflict ie violence and other difficult situations you have encountered”. Some things might be difficult to verify but we can let the arbiter decide whether s/he trust them or not.
This doesn’t even make sense. I made some simple claim now I have to deal with forum neurotics. Forum posting is not a lifestyle.
It is not hard to see how stupid advice can be costly. Go away.
Y’know, there is a very simple solution to that.
LOL. You wish.