The article you link to doesn’t mention either “pattern” or “deception” in its text—at least, not in any relevant sense. It looks more like a laundry list of purported concerns; I’m ready to believe that some of these concerns might be more justified than others—but that still does not convince me that there’s a relevant ‘pattern’ here.
The article you link to doesn’t mention either “pattern” or “deception” in its text—at least, not in any relevant sense. It looks more like a laundry list of purported concerns; I’m ready to believe that some of these concerns might be more justified than others—but that still does not convince me that there’s a relevant ‘pattern’ here.