Johnicholas makes an excellent point about the fuzziness of both intelligence and race. The complexities involved with defining both of these concepts has prevented (to my knowledge) anything like a scientific study of the OP’s assertion.
Does it make sense to assign a higher credibility to a question of fact on the basis of the opinion of a top expert in the field, when there is no way that his opinion is informed by anything resembling a scientific study? I don’t think so.
Johnicholas makes an excellent point about the fuzziness of both intelligence and race. The complexities involved with defining both of these concepts has prevented (to my knowledge) anything like a scientific study of the OP’s assertion.
Does it make sense to assign a higher credibility to a question of fact on the basis of the opinion of a top expert in the field, when there is no way that his opinion is informed by anything resembling a scientific study? I don’t think so.