Ah, but what are you comparing it to? You get ~0.0001 [avcado]s per [avocado], which is even worse than, say, the ~0.001 [straberry]s per [strawberry].
Not looking at ratios, just at the absolute number of opportunities to tell people they misspelt avocado. (Of course, that’s just one of an infinite number of possible misspellings… though, admittedly, most misspellings of avocado are difficult to recognize as such.)
So, given that the string “avocado” is a negligible fraction of all human-produced text, there are, like, exabytes worth of opportunities online right now.
Ah, but what are you comparing it to? You get ~0.0001 [avcado]s per [avocado], which is even worse than, say, the ~0.001 [straberry]s per [strawberry].
Not looking at ratios, just at the absolute number of opportunities to tell people they misspelt avocado. (Of course, that’s just one of an infinite number of possible misspellings… though, admittedly, most misspellings of avocado are difficult to recognize as such.)
Ah, I see!
So, given that the string “avocado” is a negligible fraction of all human-produced text, there are, like, exabytes worth of opportunities online right now.
Yes, exactly.
Incidentally, you misspelled “frivolous.”