I decided to post my thoughts about these changes seperately:
By default, community, meta and daily are hidden. I would prefer all of them to be shown, but at the least, hiding meta from new users seems like a bad idea.
When I visited the daily section, the personal blog post icon was showing up next to every blog post
I’m a huge fan of the best content stars and blog titles in recent posts, but wish they showed up in daily as well. It would also be nice if the blog title on the page that displays the post.
When I visited the daily section, the personal blog post icon was showing up next to every blog post
Yep, this is a bug, thanks for pointing it out!
By default, community, meta and daily are hidden. I would prefer all of them to be shown, but at the least, hiding meta from new users seems like a bad idea.
I believe it makes the page much more cluttered and distracting, to have all of them. Re meta, I think you’re pointing to a model where many users find it difficult to find meta, and thus site changes are not understood and things aren’t used. I am surprised to hear the difficulty you had finding meta. I’m curious if you had an initial, false impression as to what the three dots beneath ‘frontpage’ did? If people generally find it non-intuitive, then this is definitely something to be changed, and I will keep on the lookout for this in future user interviews. Thanks for the datapoint.
I’m a huge fan of the best content stars and blog titles in recent posts, but wish they showed up in daily as well. It would also be nice if the blog title on the page that displays the post.
Yep, that sounds correct that they should be in daily. Will think about including in the posts themselves.
I agree with Chris that it would be good not to have community/meta/daily hidden by default. The amount of clutter that those options produce isn’t that high and having them not hidden makes it faster for users to navigate around the website and makes them more discoverable.
I think it makes only sense to hide elements that are supposed to be seldomly used and I don’t think those qualify for that.
Hmm, will think about it more. I do feel like it’s important to disincentivise the meta section of the site (all sites end up becoming about themselves if you don’t push against it, which is why posts about the social community don’t get to frontpage). Also I think that I have a stronger intuition that clutter and complexity on a page is really damaging to the average user experience.
Also, note that if you’re someone who wants to always see e.g. ‘community’ when you land on the site, if you’re logged in the last one you have open will be stored and saved for you.
How about adding a button to collapse the list and remember whether it’s expanded or collapsed? That way users who want it to be expanded can have what they want and others as well.
“Hmm, will think about it more. I do feel like it’s important to disincentivise the meta section of the site”—Well maybe it was better when meta was in the menu then? It was discoverable, but empirically we could see that most of the discussion was occurring on the main page nonetheless.
In any circumstance, perhaps we should only be attempting to discourage meta discussion if the amount of meta-discussion starts to become a problem? The current amount of meta discussion seems completely reasonable for a relatively new site where so much is still yet to be determined.
I also think during open beta it might be better to make the meta section more accessible (so people can report bugs and discuss the evolution of the site), and if it feels like we’re getting much discussion there, we have a fairly crisp moment in time (switch to lesswrong.com) where it makes sense to say “okay, now that we’re done with the beta we’re moving back to meta being more disincentivized.”
I for one did not notice there were dots below ‘frontpage’. I didn’t know the other options existed until I read this post. (I’m not sure that listing all the options is better; making the dots more prominent might be another option, or changing them to something like “More …”)
I decided to post my thoughts about these changes seperately:
By default, community, meta and daily are hidden. I would prefer all of them to be shown, but at the least, hiding meta from new users seems like a bad idea.
When I visited the daily section, the personal blog post icon was showing up next to every blog post
I’m a huge fan of the best content stars and blog titles in recent posts, but wish they showed up in daily as well. It would also be nice if the blog title on the page that displays the post.
I tried visited https://www.lesserwrong.com/feed.xml?view=community&karmaThreshold=10, but it didn’t seem to contain any entries.
Thoughts:
Yep, this is a bug, thanks for pointing it out!
I believe it makes the page much more cluttered and distracting, to have all of them. Re meta, I think you’re pointing to a model where many users find it difficult to find meta, and thus site changes are not understood and things aren’t used. I am surprised to hear the difficulty you had finding meta. I’m curious if you had an initial, false impression as to what the three dots beneath ‘frontpage’ did? If people generally find it non-intuitive, then this is definitely something to be changed, and I will keep on the lookout for this in future user interviews. Thanks for the datapoint.
Well that’s definitely also a bug, cheers.
Yep, that sounds correct that they should be in daily. Will think about including in the posts themselves.
I agree with Chris that it would be good not to have community/meta/daily hidden by default. The amount of clutter that those options produce isn’t that high and having them not hidden makes it faster for users to navigate around the website and makes them more discoverable.
I think it makes only sense to hide elements that are supposed to be seldomly used and I don’t think those qualify for that.
Hmm, will think about it more. I do feel like it’s important to disincentivise the meta section of the site (all sites end up becoming about themselves if you don’t push against it, which is why posts about the social community don’t get to frontpage). Also I think that I have a stronger intuition that clutter and complexity on a page is really damaging to the average user experience.
Also, note that if you’re someone who wants to always see e.g. ‘community’ when you land on the site, if you’re logged in the last one you have open will be stored and saved for you.
I feel that a clear distinction to keep the meta discussion out of the normal discussion should be enough to prevent the dynamic you want to prevent.
How about adding a button to collapse the list and remember whether it’s expanded or collapsed? That way users who want it to be expanded can have what they want and others as well.
“Hmm, will think about it more. I do feel like it’s important to disincentivise the meta section of the site”—Well maybe it was better when meta was in the menu then? It was discoverable, but empirically we could see that most of the discussion was occurring on the main page nonetheless.
In any circumstance, perhaps we should only be attempting to discourage meta discussion if the amount of meta-discussion starts to become a problem? The current amount of meta discussion seems completely reasonable for a relatively new site where so much is still yet to be determined.
I also think during open beta it might be better to make the meta section more accessible (so people can report bugs and discuss the evolution of the site), and if it feels like we’re getting much discussion there, we have a fairly crisp moment in time (switch to lesswrong.com) where it makes sense to say “okay, now that we’re done with the beta we’re moving back to meta being more disincentivized.”
I for one did not notice there were dots below ‘frontpage’. I didn’t know the other options existed until I read this post. (I’m not sure that listing all the options is better; making the dots more prominent might be another option, or changing them to something like “More …”)
The three dots are super easy to overlook. I scanned the page for other locations where meta could located, but I couldn’t see anything.