Group performance research indicates that the ability for side groups to nucleate around specific research questions who then bring back their findings to the main group is a key component. Sometimes there will be a negative result: that research isn’t useful to the main arc of progress. If too many such projects have negative results it will discourage their formation.
I think Romeo is personally familiar with this research. Are you? If not, we are playing a game of telephone: Romeo interprets research papers, then you correct Romeo based on your interpretation of Romeo.
For the purpose of this discussion, the distinction between questions and answers may be semantic. Any ‘answer’ can be rephrased as a ‘question’: “Is [answer] the solution to [problem]?”
Group performance research indicates that the ability for side groups to nucleate around specific research questions who then bring back their findings to the main group is a key component. Sometimes there will be a negative result: that research isn’t useful to the main arc of progress. If too many such projects have negative results it will discourage their formation.
Note: around questions. Not about specific answers to questions.
I think Romeo is personally familiar with this research. Are you? If not, we are playing a game of telephone: Romeo interprets research papers, then you correct Romeo based on your interpretation of Romeo.
For the purpose of this discussion, the distinction between questions and answers may be semantic. Any ‘answer’ can be rephrased as a ‘question’: “Is [answer] the solution to [problem]?”
Not in this case, I don’t think so.
Based on what evidence?