I notice that the karma on this post has fluctuated a bit. I don’t care about the karma per se, but I do care that someone indicated they don’t want to see more like this. So I invite any criticism here and now, that I may improve.
I have karma display turned off (greasemonkey script). It stresses me out. I think your comment could certainly expand on point 3⁄4. Really what I was looking for as a response to the post is a good pointer on what sort of algorithms or tools could potentially give me good results on this problem to direct my studying, and perhaps what textbooks or introductions I should be reading.
But point 1 is good. I hadn’t thought to do that. I was just going to go on common sense, and a kitchen sink approach.
Would it have improved the comment if I had stated explicitly at the start that my reply was not directly responsive to your request but rather addressed an oversight/implicit assumption?
I notice that the karma on this post has fluctuated a bit. I don’t care about the karma per se, but I do care that someone indicated they don’t want to see more like this. So I invite any criticism here and now, that I may improve.
I have karma display turned off (greasemonkey script). It stresses me out. I think your comment could certainly expand on point 3⁄4. Really what I was looking for as a response to the post is a good pointer on what sort of algorithms or tools could potentially give me good results on this problem to direct my studying, and perhaps what textbooks or introductions I should be reading.
But point 1 is good. I hadn’t thought to do that. I was just going to go on common sense, and a kitchen sink approach.
Would it have improved the comment if I had stated explicitly at the start that my reply was not directly responsive to your request but rather addressed an oversight/implicit assumption?