So the question really asks three questions, two of which we can’t know the answer by definition and then asks us to compare those on some undefined and possibly nonexistent scale.
All questions ever asked on LW presupposes something, usually multiple somethings, and sometimes too many somethings to feasibly enumerate.
Yet people still have productive discussions nonetheless. I think this is also possible here.
The main presumption that some aspect of cognition is measurable and comparable across different formations of mass-energy-information certainly doesn’t seem too far-fetched.
All questions ever asked on LW presupposes something, usually multiple somethings, and sometimes too many somethings to feasibly enumerate.
Yet people still have productive discussions nonetheless. I think this is also possible here.
The main presumption that some aspect of cognition is measurable and comparable across different formations of mass-energy-information certainly doesn’t seem too far-fetched.