There’s some serious spin in this paper. They use the words “intuitive” vs “reflective” to describe answers dozens of times, whereas they use “correct” vs “incorrect” less than a dozen… but reading the actual objective description of the study, it’s clear that a subject who intuitively gets the correct answer gets called “reflective” in the results, whereas a subject who reflects on the problem for a while but still gets the trick incorrect answer gets called “intuitive” in the results.
I don’t think the distinction between easily tricked and not easily tricked can be best described as if they were two equally valid options of “cognitive style”.
There’s some serious spin in this paper. They use the words “intuitive” vs “reflective” to describe answers dozens of times, whereas they use “correct” vs “incorrect” less than a dozen… but reading the actual objective description of the study, it’s clear that a subject who intuitively gets the correct answer gets called “reflective” in the results, whereas a subject who reflects on the problem for a while but still gets the trick incorrect answer gets called “intuitive” in the results.
I don’t think the distinction between easily tricked and not easily tricked can be best described as if they were two equally valid options of “cognitive style”.