It doesn’t matter what expense account you’re taking it from—you can always compare two things and say, which is morally correct? If it’s more moral to give to malaria than purchase cryogenics, then you shouldn’t purchase cryogenics and instead give to malaria. If it’s more moral to give to purchase cryogenics instead of making frivolous expenses, then you should purchase cryogenics.
(Also, I don’t know about you, but my frivolous expense fund isn’t nearly big enough to eradicate malaria, much less purchase cryogenics afterward.)
The point is, you should never find yourself in a state where you have enough excess income after your malaria prevention donations but won’t sign up for cryonics because malaria prevention is more important to you.
EDIT: The real point is more that comparing with malaria prevention could be a dodge—you can make any purchase you want look bad via that comparison, so you need to do it consistently or you’re using it to selectively denigrate some ways of spending money.
It doesn’t matter what expense account you’re taking it from—you can always compare two things and say, which is morally correct? If it’s more moral to give to malaria than purchase cryogenics, then you shouldn’t purchase cryogenics and instead give to malaria. If it’s more moral to give to purchase cryogenics instead of making frivolous expenses, then you should purchase cryogenics.
(Also, I don’t know about you, but my frivolous expense fund isn’t nearly big enough to eradicate malaria, much less purchase cryogenics afterward.)
The point is, you should never find yourself in a state where you have enough excess income after your malaria prevention donations but won’t sign up for cryonics because malaria prevention is more important to you.
EDIT: The real point is more that comparing with malaria prevention could be a dodge—you can make any purchase you want look bad via that comparison, so you need to do it consistently or you’re using it to selectively denigrate some ways of spending money.