Hours currently tracked on the honor system; but it’s all pretty visible work, so if 2 hours are logged but I don’t see any changes to the Google doc where the researcher is tracking their research efforts, I’ll have questions.
Work can be done during any hours of the day. Almost all correspondance is by email.
The sample list of subjects is even broader than all the subjects mentioned someone on this page.
The sample list of subjects is even broader than all the subjects mentioned someone on this page.
In that case I’m a bit unclear about the sort of research I’d be expected to do were I in that position. Most of those subjects are very wide open problems. Is there an expectation that some sort of original insights be made, above and beyond organizing a clear overview of the relevant areas?
My current deal with Luke is that I can post whatever I do elsewhere as long as it isn’t crap or offensive, I don’t bill him for any time or costs involved (which can be quite substantial), I don’t post anything that might be private or sensitive (eg. I gave only sanitized scores for the remote researcher application experiment, stripped of any possible identifying information), and as long as I’m not specifically told not to. This covers most of my work, and I’m happy with it.
I’m not actually sure what the legalities would be. Hopefully the copyright remains with me, otherwise I may be committing infringement when I do something like submit an article to Wikipedia...
Hours currently tracked on the honor system; but it’s all pretty visible work, so if 2 hours are logged but I don’t see any changes to the Google doc where the researcher is tracking their research efforts, I’ll have questions.
Work can be done during any hours of the day. Almost all correspondance is by email.
The sample list of subjects is even broader than all the subjects mentioned someone on this page.
In that case I’m a bit unclear about the sort of research I’d be expected to do were I in that position. Most of those subjects are very wide open problems. Is there an expectation that some sort of original insights be made, above and beyond organizing a clear overview of the relevant areas?
No original insights required. You will not be asked to do tasks you can’t do, or research subjects you can’t research.
Is material written for this purpose the sole property of SIAI or would we be allowed to republish it or related work in other places?
My current deal with Luke is that I can post whatever I do elsewhere as long as it isn’t crap or offensive, I don’t bill him for any time or costs involved (which can be quite substantial), I don’t post anything that might be private or sensitive (eg. I gave only sanitized scores for the remote researcher application experiment, stripped of any possible identifying information), and as long as I’m not specifically told not to. This covers most of my work, and I’m happy with it.
I’m not actually sure what the legalities would be. Hopefully the copyright remains with me, otherwise I may be committing infringement when I do something like submit an article to Wikipedia...