Sorry, but I do not think this is a well written article. The formatting is strange and hard to read, and your points meander a lot. You also need to give coherent summaries a lot more. As written now, your post is hard to read, and I can’t quite tell what points you are really trying to convey. Please take this as constructive criticism, and work to make your post better.
Thank you for the criticism. I will indeed consider it. It may be that we have different theories of writing. Regarding our likely differences considering how to write, see my “Plain-talk writing: The new literary obfuscation.”
I don’t see how it can be accused of meandering. I’d be pleased to receive a personal note explaining.
Sorry, but I do not think this is a well written article. The formatting is strange and hard to read, and your points meander a lot. You also need to give coherent summaries a lot more. As written now, your post is hard to read, and I can’t quite tell what points you are really trying to convey. Please take this as constructive criticism, and work to make your post better.
Thank you for the criticism. I will indeed consider it. It may be that we have different theories of writing. Regarding our likely differences considering how to write, see my “Plain-talk writing: The new literary obfuscation.”
I don’t see how it can be accused of meandering. I’d be pleased to receive a personal note explaining.