trying to think of nice ways to say what i want to say. for me i’m afraid this is glaringly full of holes—misunderstanding about the nature of the brain, of knowledge and ways of knowing, of the way we organisation information let alone getting into the more anthropological side of what we actually see—literally how our conditioning literally even effects ‘what’ we see.
it reads like teeny pop psych trying to sound like science or spirituality whilst not having enough knowledge or maturity/experience to do so and whilst massively underestimating one’s audience.
IF you are genuinely interested in this stuff i would recommend learning about comparative epistemologies—go through all the phases and ideas about how we ‘know’, what is truth etc and have a grasp of what eons of very clever people at different points in history have had to say about it. i’d also recommend some anthropology.
trying to think of nice ways to say what i want to say. for me i’m afraid this is glaringly full of holes—misunderstanding about the nature of the brain, of knowledge and ways of knowing, of the way we organisation information let alone getting into the more anthropological side of what we actually see—literally how our conditioning literally even effects ‘what’ we see.
it reads like teeny pop psych trying to sound like science or spirituality whilst not having enough knowledge or maturity/experience to do so and whilst massively underestimating one’s audience.
IF you are genuinely interested in this stuff i would recommend learning about comparative epistemologies—go through all the phases and ideas about how we ‘know’, what is truth etc and have a grasp of what eons of very clever people at different points in history have had to say about it. i’d also recommend some anthropology.
this is just really full of holes, sorry.