I’m not entirely sure I agree but I think “what if reacts were only mapped to internal-action-reactions is an interesting prompt.”
I do think I still want “seems false” or “seems unlikely” – they’re important facets of my reaction to a thing, but the “seems” part feels important.
I do generally feel, looking at the reacts, that they’re slightly the-wrong-type-signature. i.e. I never feel an impulse to say “virtue of scholarship” but I might say “nice scholarship!” or something.
I’m not entirely sure I agree but I think “what if reacts were only mapped to internal-action-reactions is an interesting prompt.”
I do think I still want “seems false” or “seems unlikely” – they’re important facets of my reaction to a thing, but the “seems” part feels important.
I do generally feel, looking at the reacts, that they’re slightly the-wrong-type-signature. i.e. I never feel an impulse to say “virtue of scholarship” but I might say “nice scholarship!” or something.