Cooperating for reasons other than “I expect cooperating to make other people cooperate” gives people a reason to defect and make the total (and your expected) reward lower.
I’ve done the math elsewhere in this thread, and if at least a third of all respondents decide to cooperate no matter what, the optimal solution is to just defect and take their money.
Cooperating for reasons other than “I expect cooperating to make other people cooperate” gives people a reason to defect and make the total (and your expected) reward lower.
Yes. And I did cooperate because I expected that it would make other people cooperate (acausally). I was explaining why I wanted more people to cooperate, even though it would mean that Yvain would lose more money.
I’ve done the math elsewhere in this thread, and if at least a third of all respondents decide to cooperate no matter what, the optimal solution is to just defect and take their money.
Good. Then a defector has been enticed to take the survey.
Cooperating for reasons other than “I expect cooperating to make other people cooperate” gives people a reason to defect and make the total (and your expected) reward lower.
I’ve done the math elsewhere in this thread, and if at least a third of all respondents decide to cooperate no matter what, the optimal solution is to just defect and take their money.
Yes. And I did cooperate because I expected that it would make other people cooperate (acausally). I was explaining why I wanted more people to cooperate, even though it would mean that Yvain would lose more money.
Good. Then a defector has been enticed to take the survey.