In my view, “the problem of induction” is just a bunch of philosophers obsessing over the fact that induction is not deduction, and that you therefore cannot predict the future with logical certainty.
Being able to make only probablistic predictions (but understanding how that works) is one thing. Being able to make only probablistic predictions, and not even understanding how that works, is another thing.
Being able to make only probablistic predictions (but understanding how that works) is one thing. Being able to make only probablistic predictions, and not even understanding how that works, is another thing.
lmao epic, TAG. somehow—both you and me found this 5 year old article & commented on it in the past 6 hours