I might have misunderstood the part of the OP about ‘freedom of compute’. I understood it as proposing a constitutional amendment making ‘proprietary software’ not a thing and mandating that literally all software be open source.
If that’s not what it meant, what does it mean? Open source software is already a thing that exists, I’m not sure how else to interpret the proposed amendment.
I might have misunderstood the part of the OP about ‘freedom of compute’. I understood it as proposing a constitutional amendment making ‘proprietary software’ not a thing and mandating that literally all software be open source.
If that’s not what it meant, what does it mean? Open source software is already a thing that exists, I’m not sure how else to interpret the proposed amendment.