Evidence should be relevant to the claim. The claim was “[not] good for blood flow in the finger”. The original claim before that was that “[w]earing a ring is not particularly practical”. None of these two claims seem to be anywhere close to to reality.
Evidence should be relevant to the claim. The claim was “[not] good for blood flow in the finger”. The original claim before that was that “[w]earing a ring is not particularly practical”. None of these two claims seem to be anywhere close to to reality.