By implying by omission that the killing was not mostly for personal gain, do you mean to suggest that it was for the public good, or to invoke a non-excluded middle?
I make no claim about the killing—that is at least arguable and inclusion would distract from the main point that the raping in the example given (historic war bands) was not.
I make no claim about the killing—that is at least arguable and inclusion would distract from the main point that the raping in the example given (historic war bands) was not.