Don’t underestimate Wikipedia as a really good place to get a (usually) unbiased overview of things and links to more in-depth sources.
Always look at the Talk page, to get an overview about what kind of information is being removed from the article.
Connotational disclaimer: I don’t mean to imply that the removed information is always or even usually true. It’s just, sometimes the opposing views are at least mentioned in the article in a “criticism” section, but sometimes they are removed without a trace (“the article is already too long” can be a convenient excuse, especially when one side can make it too long by adding many irrelevant details).
Always look at the Talk page, to get an overview about what kind of information is being removed from the article.
Connotational disclaimer: I don’t mean to imply that the removed information is always or even usually true. It’s just, sometimes the opposing views are at least mentioned in the article in a “criticism” section, but sometimes they are removed without a trace (“the article is already too long” can be a convenient excuse, especially when one side can make it too long by adding many irrelevant details).