Ah, now I understand, thanks! I didn’t know what “epistemic spot check” meant, and just kinda assumed that this was a book summary post (which was probably careless on my part).
Yeah—I think it might be good for Epistemic Spot Checks to include a quick summary or link to the canonical explanation.
(also, general policy might be “posts that are an instance of a thing with a somewhat nuanced meaning should probably link to the full explanation of the thing.”)
Ah, now I understand, thanks! I didn’t know what “epistemic spot check” meant, and just kinda assumed that this was a book summary post (which was probably careless on my part).
Yeah—I think it might be good for Epistemic Spot Checks to include a quick summary or link to the canonical explanation.
(also, general policy might be “posts that are an instance of a thing with a somewhat nuanced meaning should probably link to the full explanation of the thing.”)
This is a good idea and I will do it next time.