I strongly upvoted because this post seemed comprehensive (based on what I’ve read at LW on these topics) and was written in a very approachable way with very little of the community’s typical jargon.
Further, it also clearly represents a large amount of work.
If you’re trying to make it more legible to outsiders, you should consider defining AGI at the top.
If you’re trying to make it more legible to outsiders, you should consider defining AGI at the top.
Good idea, I just added this note to the top:
Terminology note:There is a lot of disagreement about what “intelligence”, “human-level”, “transformative” or AGI even means. For simplicity, I will use AGI as a catch-all term for ‘the kind of powerful AI that we care about’. If you find this unsatisfyingly vague,OpenPhil’s definition of Transformative AIis my favourite precise definition.
I strongly upvoted because this post seemed comprehensive (based on what I’ve read at LW on these topics) and was written in a very approachable way with very little of the community’s typical jargon.
Further, it also clearly represents a large amount of work.
If you’re trying to make it more legible to outsiders, you should consider defining AGI at the top.
Thanks for the appreciation!
Good idea, I just added this note to the top: