Third parties aren’t stable. They can appear, but they inevitably split the vote. They always hurt their cause more than help it. Unless they are so popular they can outright replace one of the parties.
They always hurt their cause more than help it.
Huh? You mean for their cause it’s better to just curl up and die, but refusing to do so subverts their cause..?
Basically yes. First Past The Post does not satisfy the criteria Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives.
Basically yes.
Looking at reality (as opposed to theoretical abstractions), this does not seem to be true.
Third parties aren’t stable. They can appear, but they inevitably split the vote. They always hurt their cause more than help it. Unless they are so popular they can outright replace one of the parties.
Huh? You mean for their cause it’s better to just curl up and die, but refusing to do so subverts their cause..?
Basically yes. First Past The Post does not satisfy the criteria Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives.
Looking at reality (as opposed to theoretical abstractions), this does not seem to be true.