To the extent that egalitarian and exclusive results in effective organizations, hierarchical and inclusive seems to be associated with some of the least effective organizations in the world: charitable organizations. Or at least this is my impression of these types of orgs: they tend to be inclusive because they think they want to include everyone but also tend to be run with “empty” hierarchies that prevent anyone who would make them effective from doing anything. Not to say it has to be that way, but my impression is that they often do end up this way; I can think of some notable exceptions and they benefit their mission tremendously for overcoming what seems to be the default of well meaning leadership holding on to power while wanting lots of people to be included but not giving them the authority to do anything.
To the extent that egalitarian and exclusive results in effective organizations, hierarchical and inclusive seems to be associated with some of the least effective organizations in the world: charitable organizations. Or at least this is my impression of these types of orgs: they tend to be inclusive because they think they want to include everyone but also tend to be run with “empty” hierarchies that prevent anyone who would make them effective from doing anything. Not to say it has to be that way, but my impression is that they often do end up this way; I can think of some notable exceptions and they benefit their mission tremendously for overcoming what seems to be the default of well meaning leadership holding on to power while wanting lots of people to be included but not giving them the authority to do anything.