Thank you for your reply. This is not at all what I expected.
I think there’s a rule for allegories that the symbols shouldn’t be too much like the thing symbolized (in this case an allegory about sex shouldn’t use real world genders). I also recommend updating about people’s ability to interpret (especially about a fraught subject like sex) rather than complaining that they didn’t understand things the way you hoped.
This being said, I agree with you about prostitution, though more from a libertarian /sympathy for the prostitutes who should be allowed to do their work in peace than sympathy for people who have trouble finding sexual partners.
I’m not sure what the emotional journey is supposed to be. Maybe going from thinking of something as a personal problem to realizing that there’s a systemic problem?
Thank you for your reply. This is not at all what I expected.
I think there’s a rule for allegories that the symbols shouldn’t be too much like the thing symbolized (in this case an allegory about sex shouldn’t use real world genders). I also recommend updating about people’s ability to interpret (especially about a fraught subject like sex) rather than complaining that they didn’t understand things the way you hoped.
This being said, I agree with you about prostitution, though more from a libertarian /sympathy for the prostitutes who should be allowed to do their work in peace than sympathy for people who have trouble finding sexual partners.
I’m not sure what the emotional journey is supposed to be. Maybe going from thinking of something as a personal problem to realizing that there’s a systemic problem?