>So children are good, and just because not everyone agrees on that doesn’t somehow make children not good.
I can’t make sense of this statement. If my terminal value is that children are bad then that’s it. How can you even start argue with that?
>So children are good, and just because not everyone agrees on that doesn’t somehow make children not good.
I can’t make sense of this statement. If my terminal value is that children are bad then that’s it. How can you even start argue with that?