If you start with a bunch of fake signatures and alert a few people who are on Pinkers side of the equation it’s easy for the letter to go viral and in the process also bet some real signatures.
It’s worth noting that using Google docs is a low-skill signal.
It’s not a signal because it’s easy to fake. “one party credibly conveys some information about itself to another party”
In that case, I challenge you to write a letter approximately this bad, targeting a public figure approximately as famous as Pinker, disseminate it as you describe but without any attribution, and we’ll see if it gets any traction.
If you start with a bunch of fake signatures and alert a few people who are on Pinkers side of the equation it’s easy for the letter to go viral and in the process also bet some real signatures.
It’s worth noting that using Google docs is a low-skill signal.
It’s not a signal because it’s easy to fake. “one party credibly conveys some information about itself to another party”
In that case, I challenge you to write a letter approximately this bad, targeting a public figure approximately as famous as Pinker, disseminate it as you describe but without any attribution, and we’ll see if it gets any traction.
It’s a high risk battle that I don’t want to fight myself. Especially not after a public challenge.
Yes, I certainly can’t blame you!
It’s a signal. Whether or not it’s a trustworthy signal is a different matter. It’s still noting that it got sent.