I get that adding an interpreter feels like a low bar for neurosymbolic (and that scale helps considerably with making interpreters/tools useful in the first place), but I’d be curious to know what you have in mind when you hear that word.
To be honest, I didn’t really have any clear picture of what people meant be neurosymboloic.
I assumed something like massively scaled up expert systems or SVMs with hand engineered features, but I haven’t seen anyone exhibiting a clear case of something that is claimed to be a central example of a neurosymbolic system which also does any very interesting task.
I get that adding an interpreter feels like a low bar for neurosymbolic (and that scale helps considerably with making interpreters/tools useful in the first place), but I’d be curious to know what you have in mind when you hear that word.
To be honest, I didn’t really have any clear picture of what people meant be neurosymboloic.
I assumed something like massively scaled up expert systems or SVMs with hand engineered features, but I haven’t seen anyone exhibiting a clear case of something that is claimed to be a central example of a neurosymbolic system which also does any very interesting task.