I thought he was taking the “don’t bother” approach by not giving a probability estimate or arguing about probabilities.
In any case, there’s still the question of what is rational for those of us who do think SIAI’s chance of success is “small”.
I propose that the rational act is to investigate approaches to greater than human intelligence which would succeed.
This. I’m flabbergasted this isn’t pursued further.
I thought he was taking the “don’t bother” approach by not giving a probability estimate or arguing about probabilities.
I propose that the rational act is to investigate approaches to greater than human intelligence which would succeed.
This. I’m flabbergasted this isn’t pursued further.