Isn’t the value of lesswrong that we are able to explore ideas things that are not admissible elsewhere for lack of interest, lack of training, or direct aversion?
If you read the about page, that’s not how LW statement of purpose is phrased.
To quote the About page
Unlike some skeptics, Less Wrong users don’t automatically reject odd ideas and sometimes endorse them.
In this case “automatically” rejection would be a poor description even in the case where NRx is more discouraged.
If you read the about page, that’s not how LW statement of purpose is phrased.
To quote the About page
In this case “automatically” rejection would be a poor description even in the case where NRx is more discouraged.