Does anyone know anything about Bayesian statistics in academic political science? To put it mildly, political science has quite a number of open questions, and last I checked all of the statistical analysis in the field was frequentist. Political scientists spend a good chunk of their time sniping each other for getting the super-advanced frequentist statistics wrong. Maybe there’s some room for basic Bayesian statistics to do some useful work?
Alas, no. I know of Gelman because of his Bayesian stats textbook, not because of his political science background. You could email and ask him directly—he’s been responsive to emails from me and sometimes posts emails from others and his responses to his blog.
Does anyone know anything about Bayesian statistics in academic political science? To put it mildly, political science has quite a number of open questions, and last I checked all of the statistical analysis in the field was frequentist. Political scientists spend a good chunk of their time sniping each other for getting the super-advanced frequentist statistics wrong. Maybe there’s some room for basic Bayesian statistics to do some useful work?
Andrew Gelman springs to mind.
Yes, that fits the bill! Looks like a good thinker and a strong writer, too. Know anyone in comparative or international politics?
Alas, no. I know of Gelman because of his Bayesian stats textbook, not because of his political science background. You could email and ask him directly—he’s been responsive to emails from me and sometimes posts emails from others and his responses to his blog.
The sniping is called “training”.