The article says the authors are one Kauffmann & Libby, and implies it was published in the last year. So:
Go to Google Scholar, punch in ‘kauffman libby’, limit to ‘Since 2012’; and the correct paper (“Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking”) is the first hit with fulltext available on the righthand side as the text link “[PDF] from tiltfactor.org”.
I hope this will be helpful for the future.
FWIW, I’ve been compiling relevant material on this for a while. As it happens, I already had this study.
I was thinking of the bit of Unix philosophy that says: “Unix was not designed to stop its users from doing stupid things, as that would also stop them from doing clever things.” (Doug Gwyn) Hasn’t been quoted yet, so be sure to dive in at 00:00 UTC Sunday :-) Edit: Monday!
The article says the authors are one Kauffmann & Libby, and implies it was published in the last year. So:
Go to Google Scholar, punch in ‘kauffman libby’, limit to ‘Since 2012’; and the correct paper (“Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking”) is the first hit with fulltext available on the righthand side as the text link “[PDF] from tiltfactor.org”.
I hope this will be helpful for the future.
FWIW, I’ve been compiling relevant material on this for a while. As it happens, I already had this study.
Cheers! And yes, of course fiction is dangerous; that’s much of the point. A frequently valid synonym for “dangerous” is “effective”.
I’d quote you in the next rationality quotes thread if there weren’t a rule against it.
I was thinking of the bit of Unix philosophy that says: “Unix was not designed to stop its users from doing stupid things, as that would also stop them from doing clever things.” (Doug Gwyn) Hasn’t been quoted yet, so be sure to dive in at 00:00 UTC Sunday :-) Edit: Monday!