Well, then I think we do have a disagreement. I think that sometimes it is necessary to grope in the epistemic dark without such constraints before you can put together a coherent understanding that can answer such questions.
However, it looks like Mitchell_Porter has been at this for eight years and this post is all he has to show for it. I would definitely agree that counts as Doing It Wrong.
I don’t think it’s essential that everything be testable, it’s just that it would help me understand what he’s trying to say. I can’t even tell if he’s actually saying something about the way the universe works, or just relabeling things.
Well, then I think we do have a disagreement. I think that sometimes it is necessary to grope in the epistemic dark without such constraints before you can put together a coherent understanding that can answer such questions.
However, it looks like Mitchell_Porter has been at this for eight years and this post is all he has to show for it. I would definitely agree that counts as Doing It Wrong.
I don’t think it’s essential that everything be testable, it’s just that it would help me understand what he’s trying to say. I can’t even tell if he’s actually saying something about the way the universe works, or just relabeling things.